Facts About valid marriage pakistani case law Revealed
Facts About valid marriage pakistani case law Revealed
Blog Article
77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and apply Section 302, emphasizing the importance of the fair and just legal system. It is actually critical for society to understand the gravity of this offense along with the need for stringent punishment to prevent opportunity offenders and guarantee justice for your victims and their families.
Like a society, it is actually essential to continue striving for a just legal system that assures fairness, protection, and regard for all individuals’ right to life.
Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents for the Supreme Court on the United States is out there to the court’s website.
record of the department there isn't any record obtainable whatsoever regarding promotion on the petitioner(Promotion)
The recent amendment to Section 489-File in the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the law with contemporary challenges.
seventy three . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Relating the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice just isn't served, the grievance petition can be dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice is a mandatory requirement along with a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation necessitates that a grievance notice be served within the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. Should the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In case the organization is transprovincial.
The Court viewed as the case to be maintainable under Article 184 (three) For the reason that Hazard and encroachment alleged were which include to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
two. I have read the discovered counsel to the parties together with acquired DPG at size, perused the record and observed that:-
Accomplishing a case legislation search could be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case legislation searches, like:
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved Unless of course case is tried using(Bail Matters)
If the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only completed When the employee can show that that they had a good here reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as petitioner company responded to your allegations as a result they were effectively conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.